Contact EITHER.SO for Corrections and Support

Send a correction, suggest a comparison, report a broken tool, or ask about our method.

Choose the right contact

Sending the report to the matching address helps us reproduce the problem and respond with the right evidence.

Editorial corrections

Include the page URL, the exact statement, and a reliable source that supports the correction.

editor@either.so

Tool problems

Tell us the page, browser, device, input that triggered the issue, and what you expected to happen.

tools@either.so

General questions

For partnerships, accessibility feedback, privacy questions, or project suggestions.

hello@either.so

What to include in your message

Use a specific subject line and include the page URL whenever your message concerns published content or a tool. For a factual correction, identify the exact statement and provide a primary or authoritative source. For a technical problem, include the browser, device, steps that produced the issue, and the result you expected. If the question concerns scoring or interpretation, name the relevant step in our comparison methodology. This makes the report reproducible without requiring access to your device.

Useful details

How editorial corrections are handled

We compare the disputed statement with suitable evidence and the method described in our editorial policy. If a material error is confirmed, the page is corrected. We do not change a date merely to make old content appear fresh, and we do not publish personal correspondence as a testimonial or research finding.

Protect private information

Do not email passwords, identity documents, financial account details, medical records, confidential contracts, or information you do not have permission to share. A redacted example is usually enough to demonstrate a calculation or interface problem. Privacy questions can be sent to privacy@either.so.

Requests we cannot treat as evidence

A product suggestion, personal result, or poll comment can identify a question worth investigating, but one message does not establish general performance or public opinion. We may use feedback to improve a tool or plan a guide only after separating the suggestion from claims that require independent verification.